Music Censorship Essay -- Censoring Censorship Music Lyrics Essays

Music censoringToday, in the 1990s, citizens in our society are being bombarded with obscene strong from every direction. From the hate lyrics of Guns N Roses to the satanic lyrics of Montley Crue and Marilyn Manson to the sexually explicit graphical surfeit of todays movies, the issue is how much society is going to permit and where we, as a society, should we draw the line. The opendom of speech has al centerings been considered a responsibility, but that doesnt stiff that you can shout, Fire in a crowded movie theater. The really question is whether such material is harmful or dangerous to our society. legion(predicate) people are asking whether or not we should censor unquiet material. They believe that some material is too obscene for society to receive or see. The advocates of censorship get riled up because the movie pass judgment council doesnt give a move an R-rating for having the occasional f-word. One rap group, 2 Live Crew, has already had one of their albums b anned because in one call option they employ explicit references to male genitals and 87 references to oral sex. They used the word bitch more(prenominal) than 100 times and the f-word more than two hundred times.Although most people agree that we are being overwhelmed with disgustful material, in that location is no consensus on how to deal with the problem. There are three come-at-able resolves. The first is the possibility of government censorship, which would include laws and penalties for breaking these laws. The second solution is self-imposed censorship by individuals and corporations. The third solution is total free speech with no censorship.The first possible solution is government censorship. In the past government legal processs flummox been taken to control discourtesy messages. For example, in 1988, the Ku Klux Klan wanted to appear on a Kansas City, Missouri usual access cable channel. The city council decided that it would be better to close up the publi c access cable channel down instead of let the KKK air their show. Later, under the pressure of being sued, the city council reversed their decision.Critics of this elucidate of action agree that these offensive messages do exist, but legal action is not the way to deal with them. They believe that no individual acts the way the messages portray just because the messages exist. Another belief is that legal actions will restrain creative people because it mak... ...ce Clay, considered offensive by some, shouldnt be censored from those who define him humorousFreedom of speech is an important part of any participatory country. While some people may find Rush Limbaughs delineation of President Clinton offensive, his show should not be censored. This is the price that we pay to last freely in a democratic society.Censorship does not have to be the solution. You always have the right to change the channel or put down a book. You have control over what you hear, see, or read. You are not forced to see or hear the offensive speech.Opponents of the first amendment view believe that just saying no is not enough. For example, children most likely will not say no. This is wherefore these people believe that the government should at least have the right to censor what children see.Some people believe that censorship is the answer, others do not. I believe that this issue will be left up to the courts to decide. I fear that the media may become a swamp of regulations with no more entertainment value whatsoever, and I hope that this never happens. I infer that the first amendment is a great right and that we should never abridge it.