Denying Premise :: Philosophy

The quest to find surface who we argon, where we came from, where we will go after we relegate and what, if anything, controls our world has fascinated mankind throughout the centuries. Famous philosophers piddle apply their whole outlives to developing theories, and yet the closest any have espouse to success has been to not have their theories disproved. With the noesis that no theory has been prove to fact, I dont know may be the merely true answer to one of civilizations oldest questions.The idea that we raise never know the answers to these and many other questions leads to the theory of Skepticism. This theory maintains that we must doubt every single one of our empirical beliefs, as they are from our perceptions like our satisfying body. We doubt them because they are seen from the lens of our own prejudices. For example, that as our senses can deceive us, or our dreams seem real, our experiences can in any case deceive us. Therefore, we cannot with certainty s ay that anything is true, and we have no knowledge and we live in the unknown.However, Skepticism is contrary to one of the most basic of valet instincts the fear of the unknown. The desire to define the world and make order out of chaos and the refusal to accept I dont know as the answer has motivated both scientists and philosophers. Rene Descartes (1596-1650 was one such man. Though brilliant, and the condition of Mediations, feared being skeptical of the external world.Descartes wanted to disprove the skepticism theory. To do so, he first developed two innovates for the skepticism theory, and so rejected it by disproving one premise. The first premise is that of Nave Empiricism. This premise states that in all knowledge rests on our perception, our own experiences, and therefore all our knowledge is true. The second premise is the method of Doubt. Descartes claims knowledge is something that is indubitable. That is, for each body of evidence, completely one conclusion can be reached. With those two premises, Descartes derives the sub-conclusion that if we do have unique knowledge, then the evidence of our senses must rule out all other possibilities. In short, truth is derived entirely from the empirical evidence we collect.However, Descartes to a fault had a third premise which undermined the first two. This premise is that of the Evil Demon. This theory states that even with all our empirical knowledge, that there is still no material world.