Tragedy of Romeo and Juliet

Romeo and juliet essay who forgathers a t be switchdy Romeo and Juliet Who is Responsible for the Tragedy? Does Fate play a piece? Who is responsible? This forefront is ever much asked of any encounter, and commonly no one wants to admit that it was his or her pick. It thus must(prenominal) be de shapeined what the conflict was, who is responsible, and to what consummation. Shakespe ars, Romeo and Juliet, is based on a conflict. In Romeo and Juliet the conflict turns into a tragedy. instanter that we issue what the conflict was, which is a tragedy, the next standard is to determine what a tragedy is?A tragedy is a conflict that ends up with aroundthing very sad happening. In Romeo and Juliet, the tragedy, is that two of these l everyplaces kill themselves, to join the other in death. For never was a story of more than woe Than this of Juliet and her Romeo (5,3,309-310). The next step in the problem solving process is to tax who is to blame for the tragedy. To do th is we must beginning determine the different types of occasions contend in a conflict. Thither are 5 main roles in that respect is cause, an instigator, retaliator, passivist, and moderator.The first is the cause, which fundament be a person or thing, that start ups everything, and sometimes plenty dont even realize that they are contend this part. In Romeo and Juliet, one of the causes is the ancient dispute between the families. Tybalt says What, drawn and talk of cessation? I nauseate the word, as I hate hell, all Montagues and thee. (1. 1. 61-62) The second is the instigator, who is normally very mean, and something that they do or say, is usually the cause of conflict. What this person does or says is meant to arouse someone.Tybalt says to Romeo Romeo, the drive in I bear thee sess afford No better term than this megabyte art a villain. (3. 1. 53,54). These row are designed to provoke Romeo to force. The trinity role, is that of the retaliator, who responds t o the provocative nature of the instigator. Mercutio says to Tybalt Consort? What, dost gravitational constant benefit us minstrels? And thou halt minstrels of us, look to hear postal code scarcely discords. Heres my fiddlestick, heres that shall gather in you dance(3. 1. 40-43) in avenging to a verbal jab do by Tybalt. The fourth is the passivist, who does nonhing to blockade or help in the conflict.Usually someone who hasnt decided who is right and hasnt picked a side. The fifth is the moderator, who is try to retard or stop the conflict from happening. Benvolio is nerve-wracking to prevent a fight when he says I pray thee, good Mercutio, permits retire The day is hot, the Capels are abroad, An if we go steady we shall not escape a controversy, For now, these hot days, is the mad blood stirring. Now that we grant determined the roles compete in a conflict, it go fors the next step, of determining who is responsible, and to what extent easier. Shakespeare wrote t his tragedy with a lot of complexity to it.I know this because each of the people knobbed play more than one role throughout the play. First the Ancient Grudge, is a cause of fighting between the families. It has compete a major role in the development of hatred in some of the people, for instance, Tybalt has picked up a hatred for the Montagues, from his Uncle quondam(a) Capulet. This Ancient Grudge has caused two brawls foregoing to the one we see at the start of the play. Prince says Three civil brawls, bred of an airy word, By thee, old Capulet, and Montague, Have thrice wild the quiet of our streets. (1. 1. 1-83) By this speech we correspond of the nature of the ancient grudge. I consider that the ancient grudge is to be goddamned for quite a bit of the tragedy, comprehend as none of the fighting would make water happened if there was no grudge, and Romeo would hire been allowed to connect Juliet, without the secrecy. Second Tybalt is to be blamed for nigh of the t ragedy, because he started the first fight on the street. He to a fault started the fight on the beach. He killed Mercutio, which caused Romeo to retaliate and kill him. throughout the play Tybalt is al counselings the instigator, he is always expression for a fight.He says himself that he hates ataraxis What, drawn and talk of peace? I hate the word, as I hate hell, all Montagues, and thee. (1. 1. 61,62) Romeo played an important role in the tragedy, only should not be blamed for any of the tragedy. He played the role of a Moderator, most of the time, manage when he was on the beach and Tybalt challenged him to fight he says Tybalt, the reason that I project to love thee Doth much excuse the appertaining rage to such a greeting. Villain am I none Therefore farewell, I see thou knowest me not. (3. 1. 5-58) He withal plays the role of the retaliator when Tybalt kills Mercutio. Romeo goes after Tybalt to punish Mercutios death. Romeo says for Mercutios soul is nevertheless a l ittle way to a higher place our heads, staying for thine to keep him Company Either thou or I, or both must go with him. (3. 1. 117-120) so in this genius Romeos only fault was that he killed Tybalt, but Tybalt had tried to kill him, and had killed Mercutio, so Romeo should not be blamed. Mercutios is but, a very little bit to blame, for his canvas death, which made Romeo kill Tybalt, and then(prenominal) compensate Banished for that crime.Mercutio wasnt going looking for a fight, But he wasnt looking not to fight either. When Tybalt, comes and wants to fight, so Mercutio responds by challenging him to a fight as well. Mercutio says, Heres my fiddlestick, heres that shall make you dance. (3. 1. 41,42) We also learn that he is very proud. Mens look were made to look, and let them gaze I will not budge for no mans pleasure, I. (3. 1. 47,48) From these passages, from the book, I have decided that Mercutio played the role of the retaliator.Therefore his fault is only in that of T ybalts, so that he should only be slightly blamed. Benvolios Role in this conflict was nothing but as a passivist/moderator. I came to this end when he says things like I pray thee, good Mercutio, lets retire The day is hot, the Capels are abroad, And if we meet we shall not escape a brawl And We talk here in the unexclusive haunt of men Either sequestrate unto some private place, or origin coldly of your grievances, Or else depart here all eyes gaze on us. (3. 1. 43-46) By these speeches he is always trying to prevent or postpone the fight.In this flake Benvolio is not to blame at all, but rather should be commended for his attempts for peace. Friar Lawerence is to be blamed also, for he had great bringing close to beat uphers of peace after he married Juliet to Romeo. He validated the unification of these two people, because of his ideas, and he didnt do the right thing, which would be to tell the parents, and make them see that Romeo and Juliet were really in love. And to let the parents decide what would be best. He messed that up, and then he messed up some more, when he helped Juliet to deceive her parents, by faking her death.He continues to screw up to protect his original mistake of marrying Romeo and Juliet. Juliets Parents also contributed by forcing her to marry Paris, and this laboured her to fake her death, to get out of her marriage, and to get to Romeo. They were unaware of her previous marriage, so it is not really their fault. After determining this, there is still some confusion over the fault of some people, so that we have to look upon another factor, which may make things a little clearer. That factor is fate. in front determining what role fate played we must first determine the meat of fate.Fate stems from the Ancient Greek Mythologies, when there were tierce female goddesses, who were believed to spin a wander that was your life, and they would shake it, to shake up your life. It was also believed that the Fates were in cha rge of when you died and when you did die, they cut the thread. To make that more clear, Fate, is when something happens or is going to happen, and you have no control over it. It tells us right in the prologue that Romeo and Juliets love is fated A pair of star-crossed lovers take their life. I dont really believe in fate, but in this fictional tragedy, fate was an excellent preference to explain some of the things that happened. In conclusion this exciting tragic romance, has utilized a intricate web, in the responsibility for the tragedy, so that no one can be held entirely responsible, and no one is left without a part in tragedy. The way that Shakespeare makes a person play more than one of the basic roles, throughout the conflict, is a stunning way to spark interest, because people are confused by a sudden change of attitude or character. This process leaves the audience, trying to understand, so they plough intrigued.